This is the Keith Albee's sister theatre in Flushing , NY......... Unless our community bands together, the Pullman Square development will leave the Keith-Albee with an uncertain future, since currently Marshall University has no interest in obtaining it for the Marshall Artists Series. Does anyone care?
Emotional Moment As Oldtimers See Keith’s Theatre Reopened
It’s been locked up for 16 years, its marquee a rusting hulk, but the RKO Keith’s Theatre in downtown Flushing was reopened for a short time last week to give local officials a reminder of what used to be and a hint of what will be in the future. Built in 1928 by noted movie house architect Thomas Lamb, the RKO Keith’s also had live shows and was a beacon of entertainment on Northern Boulevard. It was closed in 1987 by Thomas Huang, who bought it and wanted to convert it to a shopping mall. When his plans were thwarted by the city’s Landmarks Preservation Commission because the lobby and ticket booth were landmarked, Huang sat on the property, refusing to improve it and over the years let it deteriorate. There is plenty of water damage and he even started to bulldoze the winding staircase until the city found out. After years of legal action, intervention by local politicians and even a state lawsuit that found Huang guilt of environmental crimes at the theatre, he finally sold the building late last year to a Brooklyn developer, Shaya Boymelgreen, who is highly regarded for restoring landmarked buildings. Last Thursday night, the developer opened the boarded-up building to community leaders for a brief look at what is going to be saved and restored. Although Boymelgreen has presented a preliminary plan for the site that would include adding 14 floors for mixed use and three levels of underground parking, the emphasis last week was on the landmarked lobby. Jerry Rotundi, wearing a protective mask against the dust, walked around with a flashlight in the dimly lit interior. He is the co-founder of the Committee to Save The Keith’s, organized 16 years ago, and hadn’t seen the inside of the place since 1991. He believes the damage to the building is not much worse than the last time he was there 12 years ago. For more on the Flushing tragedy...: CLICK HERE
Above, Promotional material for "Burning Annie," shot in Huntington, which premiered at the Cinequest Festival in San Jose, California in March! (c) Armak Productions. Now, ANNIE has its World Premiere slated for mid-July in Los Angeles, followed by a NYC screening and invitations to several New England film festivals. YOU GO GIRL!! BURNING ANNIE
By Tony Rutherford
After reading a “Dating” column, I felt compelled to respond with a male perspective. Of course, my opinion may topple into a minority viewpoint, since most of my friends would conclude I was a “sensitive nice guy.” Furthermore, I’m probably a “toad.” I’ve been called “caring,” “sweet” and “distinguished” but not handsome.
For more great cartoons visit The Deep End
While doing some legal research at the Drinko Library, I read an article in MU's "The Parthenon" on “Campus Counseling Center Available For Students With Problems.” Steve Hensley, then director, and “brochures” stated that “at no time during or after a student’s session will any of the information be disclosed to any person outside of the program. “ The article indicated that “privacy rights, including confidentiality of written counseling services, including test or surveys are also fully protected.” Hensley added that the center will disclose nothing without a client’s permission and that all records are destroyed following graduation. Although well intentioned, nothing could be further from reality in the State of West Virginia. The State has no testimonial privilege for any type of medical, counseling or psychiatric records. In fact, the State’s Confidentiality Statute (Sec. 27-3-1) specifically grants a broad exception --- a subpoena and a court order. Reasonably one would think that sufficient. Sorry.
Lawyers representing insurance companies in routine “garden variety” personal injury cases demand access to all of a plaintiff’s medical records, including all forms of counseling (marital, addictions, mental health, domestic violence). Any time that a plaintiff claims “pain and suffering” and “emotional distress,” the defense attorneys swarm in on the records like feeding sharks.
The West Virginia Supreme Court and the legislature has refused to limit intrusive defense attorneys.
For instance, an employee of Branches domestic violence shelter suffered an injury to her leg while helping another employee jump start a vehicle. A law suit was filed in Cabell County Circuit Court asking for compensation. However, the insurer’s defense attorney demanded access to the injured woman’s counseling records. Even though her husband was no where near the scene, they asked questions about his mental state. After he suffered a heart attack, the woman settled the auto accident suit. She and her husband then sued Branches for breaching confidentiality. Sometime this summer, the West Virginia Supreme Court will issue its opinion.
But that’s only the beginning. Still another insurance defense attorney gained access HER HUSBAND'S substance abuse records. These are allegedly protected by both federal and state law.
During discovery, the insurance attorney admitted that they regularly seek counseling records --- and get them --- in personal injury cases. Hence, if you are a student and injured in a car accident, your records could be spread out in court as part of the “public record.” Although the U.S. Supreme Court has granted a “privilege” for these records, the “privilege” applies only in federal courts. The U.S. Supreme Court admits that state laws are simply “patchwork” and “an uncertain privilege is like no privilege at all.” The West Virginia Supreme Court has yet to rule on the constitutionality of the broad and overly vague statute. In the Thompson v. Branches case, they side-stepped the confidentiality AND constitutional issues by declaring that the statute of limitations began when the woman's outspoken, imbiding husband bluffed an attorney with his suspicions. Thus, based on the ruling, women think the same way as their husbands. And believe it or not, the US Supreme Court let the decision stand.
Later, the West Virgiia Supreme Court refused to hear the Thompson v. Prestera and Campbell Woods, which involved negligence under federal standards. The Cabell County Court ruled that Mr. Thompson, though impaired, gave “informed consent” to release records from the 70s of which he had no memory.
I have a similar horror story. You've observed the photos on this page. After I was the victim of a violent attack, I sought justice. Instead of prosecuting the perpetrator, the "system" became more interested in my unrelated treatment for post-traumatic stress following a decade old car accident. Despite a bulging bond that required surgical correction with pins, the focus stayed on the victim's OTHER medical records, not how the injury occurred. Furthermore, the circuit court REFUSED to let the jury SEE the photos posted here.
This is not meant to discourage you from seeking counseling. Upon entering treatment, you should ask your therapist to explain the parameters of confidentiality. The notes of your session can and will be released against your will if you happen to become the subject of civil litigation. You might want to request that your therapist keep his or her pen in their pocket!
Dazed and Confused Cafe
Video Tape Trading
Bullies Bashing...what happens to victims?
The Vanishing First Amendment
Be Careful What You "Feel"
Add Me to the Web